|
|
<< Previous  | Page |
| |
| blondedarlin | |
| I'm all about the wait, but there's nothing worse than waiting a few months just to find out that he can't last more than 2 minutes or has a thing the size of your pinky! Or both! | |
| Olivia -- Tucson | |
|
|
|
| Raph -- Coralville | |
| I would like to point out that the option of waiting longer than three months was not addressed. I'm a bit old fashioned in this, I suppose, but I want to wait until I'm at least engaged before having intercourse (other things are ok). What's the analysis of that option? | |
| nicole007 -- San Diego | |
| Good point, Raph. I think the article is saying anytime after 3 months. I think it's admirable to wait to have sex until you're engaged. Whoever you finally give yourself to will be a lucky, lucky man. | |
| Janey2 | |
|
|
|